section cutter造句

• Even if this article truly was completely " superfluous ", " overlong ", " ridiculous ", " overkill ", and needed to be " leaner ", " stripped down " ( realize that all that is just RHETORIC ? not examples ! ! the section cutters never justified themselves properly in the first place ), the thing to do about it would have been to put the article up for FAR . . . except, see, it had just been up eight months prior, and the parts of it which these recent editors took offense to where actually the parts of the article that had changed the LEAST in 2008 and most resembled the sections at the time the article was resoundingly promoted to featured.